An Immigrant’s Take on SELMA

Last week, I went to see the critically acclaimed film Selma, which depicts the events surrounding the 1965 march for voting rights from Selma to Montgomery. This movie comes at an especially opportune time due to issues surrounding police brutality at the forefront of our national consciousness, as documented by #BlackLivesMatter. In many ways, the film shows how little progress the United States has made in truly achieving “liberty and justice for all.” As an immigrant, the inequalities Martin Luther King, Jr. and his contemporaries struggled against are all too familiar. As I watched the film, I couldn’t help but notice the similarities between the second-class status of African Americans in 1965 and undocumented immigrants in this country today. This is not to say that our experiences or struggles are the same, but that this nation has a long history of fear and rejection of those deemed “outsiders” for their race, class, legal status, gender or sexual orientation.

There is a connection between Blacks in 1965 and undocumented immigrants in 2015. When Oprah Winfrey’s character lowered her head in shame after being turned away from registering to vote, I saw my mother’s teary-eyed face on the day she was rejected from renewing her driver’s license due to her legal status. As the film dramatized the murder of Jimmy Lee Jackson, I pictured the death of 15-year-old Sergio Hernandez at the hands of a Border Patrol agent, who claimed the boy was throwing rocks across the border. While the film showed the Black community listening intently as President Johnson announced the Voting Rights Act, with hope beaming and tears forming in their eyes, I was taken back to the day President Obamaannounced Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA). Like the many African Americans who gathered to hear the news that would determine their right to self-determination, my family and fellow churchgoers gathered to hear the long awaited news of relief and protection for immigrant families. In both scenarios, the years and years of waiting were finally over.

We rarely acknowledge that the legacy of immigration in America is bound up with the horrific legacy of the transatlantic slave trade. Beginning with the forced migration of African slaves to the New World, African Americans and immigrant communities have often been the victims of nativism and the fear of sociocultural differences. Foreigners, immigrants and native-born minorities purportedly threaten the “American” way of life and are marked as targets for deportation, detention and other forms of oppression and subjugation.

Although African labor built much of the economy of the United States, slaves, like today’s undocumented immigrants, had no way to gain citizenship or become full-fledged members of American society. As illustrated in Selma, even after Emancipation, unable to vote, shackled by “separate but equal” law and discriminated against due to the color of their skin, African Americans were prohibited from receiving the full rights and benefits of inclusion into the citizenry. On the contrary, African Americans suffered —and continue to suffer— from systemic violence and dehumanization in the country that was built on the backs of their chained ancestors. In the same way that the world economy was largely built on slave labor, the modern American economy has become increasingly dependent on immigrant labor.

Read the rest at Latino Rebels…

State of the Union Hints at Obama’s Lame Duck Term

There has been a growing trend in the State of the Union address the President gives each year. He stands before Congress and begins to alternate between populist appeals,  personalised stories, and non-starter policy proposals.

This year was no different, although there is a possibility that a couple minor changes may be made.

Little of the actual public policy substance mentioned in President Obama’s speech last night has any hope of passing two hostile houses of Congress in any form that he may want. The President’s premier proposal, an increase in the capital gains tax, is chief among these political non-starters.

Not only is the proposed tax increase horrible tax policy, the likelihood of it going anywhere is all of nil. Instead, the President should have proposed some form of corporate tax cut, which could achieve similar revenue goals while having bipartisan support in Congress.

His proposed idea of free community college is equally misguided. The proposal removes tax advantages on college savings plans (known as 529 plans) in order to lower the costs of community college. This amounts to a direct transfer from those saving for a traditional college education to those who instead choose a community college.

There is plenty of reason to believe that this would do little for the aggregate cost of education to society and could even encourage community college costs to rise, given the influx of “free money” that did not exist before. Yet all of this is a rather moot point, as the likelihood of such an expansion passing is minimal.

The President once again talked about infrastructure. He asked Congress to pass a new infrastructure bill, increasing spending on things like ports, bridges, internet, and rail lines. This says nothing about whether the aggregate lack of public spending in infrastructure is a problem.

Read the rest at City A.M. …

Advocate Yeonmi Quoted by North Korean News

Advocate Yeonmi Park clarified the story of her escape from North Korea for North Korean News.

“My father defected in 2008 and I have my family picture, which is taken in China,” she said in the interview, in opposition to the video’s claim that her father didn’t defect and died of cancer in North Korea.

“There are around 10 defectors in South Korea who used to live with my family. He died while under treatment in China and his tomb is also in China,” she said.

You can find the whole article online here.